- Using outsourcing can certainly save your clients money. Obviously, it costs less for legal talent from Cleveland than the same talent from New York.
- Ethical issues still abound. Friedman quotes Professor Stephen Gillers - "There is no problem with offshoring because even though the lawyer in India is not authorized by an American state to practice law, the review by American lawyers sanitizes the process." The answer may not be that simple. A more complete analysis is set out in Mark Ross' article on LLRX - Ethics of Legal Outsourcing White Paper.
Friday, February 26, 2010
Outsourcing Redux
A law firm that decides to outsource some of its work is making a decision that is in step with the times. Although outsourcing is not right for every firm, there are factors that weigh heavily in favor of a considered approach. At least that's what Ron Friedman argues in this recent LLRX post - Law Firms Now Outsourcers? Friedman's short article draws together a number of sources that review the state of outsourcing today. Friedman makes two points to ponder:
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Best Jucicial Decisions of 2009?
Since 2005, The Green Bag has published the annual Green Bag Almanac & Reader. Find it here in our collection. This is a compendium of "good legal writing from the past year, selected by the luminaries and sages on our board of advisers." This year, those "luminaries" chose the following lead opinions as the best judicial decisions of 2009:
Coming soon - the best concurrences and dissents.
Frank H. Easterbrook - Buchmeier v. United States, 581 F. 3d 561 (7th Cir. 2009) Found via Google Scholar.Which one is best? You be the judge. So to speak.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg - United States v. Hayes, 129 S. Ct. 1079 (2009) From the USSC official website.
Jed S. Rakoff - SEC v. Bank of America Corp., 2009 WL 2916822 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) From the Southern District of New York website.
Coming soon - the best concurrences and dissents.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)